Art in the time of hyperobjects

I like this sentence by Timothy Morton. He writes about the agency of a painting by the Aboriginal artist Yukultji Napangati, a painting by which he is spellbound. He concludes:

“We shall see when it comes to talking about art in the time hyperobjects just how significant it is that Napangati somehow manages to combine map and device.”

I ask myself, what this means? How can the artwork both be a mapping of a socioeconomic field, and at the same time a means, maybe a technical means even, to get into relation with that field?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s